History: Old Logos
Preview of version: 30
Table of contents |
Related materials
Category:
communication_(public)
Some notes
|
Tiki 4
gezza: I think the current logo is too "edgy", chi likes to flow around rounded things..also web 2.0 look is more for rounded corners, so for Tiki 4 we should soften the current logo just a bit and it would fit better into the great new css styles.
Gary (chibaguy): I like the edges, myself, and in fact prefer a logo image that has a definite border (as much as I like luci's artwork overall), rather than having a reflection and other semi-transparent parts. I think these cause unnecessary trouble when being applied, and also reduce the effectiveness of the logo as a distinct image.
gezza: reflection was just that jquery effect inside Tiki, I removed it
Some sketches
get the source svg: tiki_logo_small_02.svg (21.39 Kb)
{POLL(pollId="24")}Which one do you like?{POLL}
Tiki 3
This is the current version
Tiki 1.9
[+]Tiki full icon
Tiki 4
Some sketches
Alias
History
| Information | Version | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marc Laporte | 31 | |||||
| Marc Laporte | 30 | |||||
| Marc Laporte cleanup | 29 | |||||
| Marc Laporte | 28 | |||||
| Marc Laporte | 27 | |||||
| Marc Laporte | 26 | |||||
| Marc Laporte | 25 | |||||
| gezza categorized | 24 | |||||
| gezza commented out the Poll plugin as it breaks the layout | 23 | |||||
| gezza | 22 | |||||
| gezza | 21 | |||||
| Gary Cunningham-Lee I like the hard edges, myself. | 20 | |||||
| gezza | 19 | |||||
| Marc Laporte | 18 | |||||
| luciash d' being 🧙 | 17 | |||||
| amette nothing - just saved to get attachement links back... | 16 | |||||
| luciash d' being 🧙 white bg of the png + gif for msie users | 15 | |||||
| luciash d' being 🧙 source attached | 14 | |||||
| luciash d' being 🧙 my version | 13 | |||||
| Mose | 12 | |||||
| Mose | 11 | |||||
| Mose | 10 | |||||
| Mose | 9 | |||||
| Mose | 8 | |||||
| Mose | 7 | |||||
This new logotype is very simple, pixel based on a favicon format, 16x16px, and well, when it still look good and meaningful (if ever it does). The invisible W suggested by the 2 dots aside the T is sortof subtile, but you can imagine it. The image of a circuit also can appear if you focus on the empty beetween the dots and the T. It can also look like a mask, or an helmet like a sortof stylized medieval or tribal pictogram. The shadow at the bottom of the outlined shapes put them in relief, and also induce a concept of transformation, or a footprint or a weight.